HBN’s position on vaccines. The unrelenting panic-infused pressure for universal vaccination against covid-19 conveniently ignores (and actively suppresses knowledge of) the fact that there are effective treatments for the disease. Although I do have serious concerns about the risks of the vaccines and will not get one myself at least until there are better vaccines, However, I am not a doctor, and everyone’s situation is unique. That is why, I do NOT tell anyone (even my husband) that they should not be vaccinated. My job as a journalist is to provide information so that the reader (or listener) can make an informed decision rather than blindly following government directives. Check out the side effects and deaths in this database that analyzes CDC reports. At this point, the choice is still yours and so are the consequences (which I pray are good). However, it may start to sound as though you do not have a choice and mandates are probably coming. The federal and state governments as well as world influencers like Bill Gates are intent on persuading everyone on the planet to vaccinate. They use either bribing with carrots such as lotteries and freebies or bludgeoning with sticks such as peer-shaming, pleas for supposed patriotism and blocking access to locations, services and events. Because so much of what is being done doesn’t make health sense based on the science, the motivation must be about power and control.

It is telling that the stakeholders (i.e. especially government & big pharma) do not give much credit for the natural immunity a person has after recovering from covid. Read Bill Sardi’s article Natural Immunity Confers 13-Fold Decreased Risk For Unexpected Infection After Vaccination

The big push. The US is bloody serious about vaccines! According to a nonprofit advocacy group, The Defender, “U.S. gov funded vaccine research to the tune of $9 billion+, spent $22 billion to support vaccine distribution, shelled out another $10 billion to expand access + $3 billion to spend on ad campaign to combat vaccine hesitancy.” With all this firepower, one would assume that the authorities would know for sure that the shots are effective and safe. (Note, vaccines for previous coronaviruses failed and there is mounting evidence that the vaccines are not as protective or safe as advertised. Also, the government’s track record for health is spotty at best, deadly at worst. Read about that. Mandates are coming, based in part on the idea that the Pfizer vaccine now has full FDA approval. Not so fast, there is a bait and switch going on. You can find technical write-ups on that, but this video explains the situation in simple language.

In case you are not already sufficiently concerned about the government’s recent attempts to increase power over us, check this out: A page on the CDC website discusses factors involved in rounding up high risk people (un-vaccinated, elderly, infirm, etc.) and isolating them in camps that they laughingly call “green zones”! On that page the CDC said: “High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.” YIKES!

MYTHS debunked. When people spread untruths, they detract from legitimate concerns and help the US’s foreign enemies who relentlessly and cleverly try to stir up trouble.

  • Claim = You can get the VIRUS from the vaccination. There is no virus in the vaccine, not even the weakened type used in other more conventional vaccines. You might feel bad (especially after the second shot) but that is just because your immune system has been made to think you have the virus and has reacted. Of course, you can still get the virus after being vaccinated, but that is from having been exposed to it.
  • Claim = The shots implant a MICROCRHIP. While this sci-fi idea sounds like something the powerful might want to use, there is no evidence that it has happened. The Facebook video that promoted the idea used manipulated footage. Just think about the Computer Generated Imagery (CGI) in movies…it is hard to tell what is real these days. That said, the goal of the globalists may still be identification and control of individuals and they can do that just with the database they acquire giving vaccines.
  • Claim = The shots will NOT cause fertility problems. Dr. Fauci said (apparently without any good evidence) that there are no fertility concerns with the vaccines. There were fertility problems in the early animal studies. Also, we now know that the vaccines cause our cells (even those in the ovaries) to make the toxic covid-19 spike protein and that could reasonably be expected to cause fertility issues.
  • Claim = If you are fully vaccinated, you are SAFE. There are tens of thousands of breakthrough infections in the fully vaccinated. Now the government admits the fully vaccinated can contract and spread the disease. The vaccine pushers may be right that the vaccinated are less likely to have a serious case and die.
  • Claim = Clots caused by the shots are RARE. This short video of Dr. Charles Hoffe, a Canadian physician, explains quite clearly how the clots form because of the vaccine. He has shown by testing his patients that 62% of those vaccinated have recently developed blood clots. What he explains is what we’ve been hearing from Bill Sardi and Peter McCullough, MD and other experts. The news agency Reuters’ “fact checkers” disagree, But, what if the checkers are lazy, uninformed, brainwashed and/or easily impressed by fancy job titles? Part of the confusion is that while major heart attack and stroke-inducing clots shortly after vaccines may be rare, the insidious, long-acting, system-wide MICRO clots are not.

The vaccine types. Because of government funding to pharmaceutical companies and the relaxing of regulations, three vaccines gained “emergency use authorization” in months rather than the usual years. Even though the immune protection may not last for very long (i.e. boosters required), other changes made to the body are permanent and not reversible.

Pfizer (with BioNTech) developed mRNA “vaccines and it became available Dec. 11, 2020. This type of gene therapy uses the messenger genetic material which shuttles information from our DNA to cells in the body and tells the cells what to do. In this case, the message is to make coronavirus spike protein. That foreign substance then activates the immune system to be prepared to fight the spike. Vaccine is in quotes above because its make-up and mode of action is unlike previous vaccines and may not even meet the CDC’s strict definition for a vaccine. This CDC page explains what is in the Pfizer shot. This article reports that Documents Reveal that Pfizer Skipped Critical Testing and Cut Corners on Quality Standards.

Moderna. This vaccine, is also a mRNA 2-shot type. This CDC page has more information. It apparently is a stronger dose, delivering 40 trillion packets of mRNA which may be 3 times as much as Pfizer. It may be a longer lasting good effect, but is possibly more dangerous. If only the government would do its job and report on comparisons.

Johnson and Johnson. This is a vector type shot which injects pieces of the virus (vectors), in this case just the spike protein, not a whole virus capable of causing disease. It has the advantage of needing just one shot and more convenient refrigeration. Note that J&J never before successfully created a vaccine of any kind. Use of the J&J vaccine was paused from April 13 to April 23 because the FDA and CDC wanted to investigate 6 cases where women developed blood clots after the shot. It was ultimately decided that since the covid virus itself can produce clots and so its use was resumed. (Apparently the “spike protein” is the cause of clots in both the disease and vaccine side effects.)

This resource of the CDC tracks current vaccination rates. This resource makes the CDC adverse vaccine events statistics understandable.

Safety—Are the risks theoretical or real? First, please understand that all brands of vaccines for covid-19 in use now have only an “emergency use authorization”. Hopefully, it may be a couple of years before the FDA gives full approval because there are so many unanswered questions, and the safety has not been proven over a long enough time (two years of safety date was previously the rule). Many population groups, such as pregenant women) were not tested. The studies were not designed to detect a reduction in outcomes such as severe illness, hospitalization or death. This is especially worrisome because the mRNA is a class of immunization that is new to the planet. From vaccines for various diseases used over the years, as many as 400 different classifications of side effects have been documented. Note: because vaccine makers are immune from liability, there is a National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program which has paid out billions to compensate victims for other earlier types of vaccines. (If you had a loved one die or become permanently disabled as a result of vaccination, the money would not be much comfort.)

CDC says heart inflammation cases were higher than expected in 16- to 24-year-olds after second Covid vaccine shot, but still rare.

The official CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) keeps track of what is reported to them. Regarding the new covid-19 vaccines, from December 14, 2020, through August 6, 2021 VAERS received 571,831 reports of harm, 12,791 reports of death (0.0019%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. and 77,490 serious injuries. The definition of “serious injuries“ includes for example, permanent disability, miscarriages and birth defects. To put those harm numbers in a more realistic perspective, know that in 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services concluded “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported by the VAERS system.” Applying that rule might mean there could have been 1,852,800 serious covid vaccine injuries so far if all events were reported.

Here is a website that is a forum where victims discuss their side effects from the vaccines and what they do about them. Note that there are hundreds of pages to browse.

Do not take the vaccine IF…Even Pfizer says to avoid it if you have allergies, especially if you are allergic to Polyethylene glycol (PEG) which is found in many skin creams, lotions, soaps, hair products and shower gels. PEGs are petroleum-based compound that are often used  as thickeners, solvents, softeners, and moisture-carriers and has never before been used in an approved vaccination. Read here about other groups that should be cautious. (Also other shocking information.)

Some of the events to older and now the new vaccines may be allergic reactions to a chemical used in the preparation (PGE, polyethylene glycol). Adverse PEG-related immune reactions, include life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly 70% of Americans may have already been sensitized to PEG, which might result in reduced efficacy and an increase in side effects. Although apparently not an issue here, there have also been legitimate concerns about other constituents of various vaccines such as the nerve-damaging metals mercury and aluminum.

Long term effects? Even more concerning, many medical experts predict a whole new variety of side effect with the mRNA type vaccines such as Pfizer and Moderna’s. They work by causing a broad range of cells in the body become “factories” making the distinctive coronavirus spike protein. That is a problem because the spike protein seems to cause blood clots even when it is attached to the virus. Also, in case of a coronavirus infection at some later date, the immune system will spring into action going after not only the virus, but also very likely the healthy cells that have made the spike protein…for example, in the cells lining the arteries and lungs.

The vaccine trials were not designed to assess rare or delayed adverse events. The usual animal reproductivity studies have not yet been completed. (We are using unsuspecting humans for that experiment!)

I also find it worrisome that the vaccines are tested on “healthy” people when most adults in the US do not fit that description. Learn more about that issue.

Experts who oppose the vaccines and why they do.

Efficacy. The FDA is allowing companies to define effectiveness as “prevention of mild symptoms such as cough, vomiting and chills”. The studies are NOT designed to detect a reduction in severe illness, hospitalization, or death although that is what authorities now claim. Also, please be aware that after vaccination, people still need to be cautious because we now know that fully vaccinated persons can still contract and spread the disease.

  • Reuters report. “The coronavirus variant discovered in South Africa can break through the protection provided by Pfizer Inc and BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine to some extent, a real-world data study in Israel found….The South African variant, B.1.351, was found to make up about 1% of all the COVID-19 cases across all the people studied, according to the study by Tel Aviv University and Israel’s largest healthcare provider, Clalit. But among patients who had received two doses of the vaccine, the variant’s prevalence rate was eight times higher than those unvaccinated – 5.4% versus 0.7%.” [Wow, that is a fascinating result!]
  • We should remember that existing vaccines for other diseases are not 100% effective or safe. For example, according to the CDC, effectiveness of the annual flu shot can be as low as 10% in 2004 to 19% in 2014 and a high of 60% in the 2010 season. The average for 15 years is about 40%. Rates are best in years when the virus type has not mutated into a bad match for what they guessed. And flu shots are more protective of healthy adults aged 18 to 46. The vaccines are much less effective in the elderly because their immune function is low.
  • Efficacy Statistical Flim Flam. This may be hard to get your head around. Pfizer’s vaccine study included approximately 44,000 people. Of that total, 170 got the virus. In that disease group, 8 had gotten the shot and 162 were in the placebo group. They compared those two numbers to get the 95% efficacy number. That is what is called a relative risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction was more like 1%. However, what we are led to believe is that 95% of the 44,000 were protected.
  • 9 NY Yankees players and staff test positive although fully vaccinated.
  • We are already hearing about the likely need for booster shots, perhaps every year. (Hmm like an annuity for the drug companies.😊) Research has just begun on how long the vaccine effects last and if a booster shot would need to be the same brand as the initial vaccination. I hope they are also documenting how long the T-cell immunity from having had the disease lasts.

Mandates. Can you be forced to take a vaccine?

  • Here is a source for the Religious Exemption. Here is another. Fill out the form on this website, and a PDF will be emailed. If an original signature is required, it will take 5 business days to be sent by USPS. All at no cost of course, just be patient as they are receiving 1000s of requests. 
  • The “Consent / refusal” form originally supported by Bill Sardi was taken down because as he said “Government ruled no consent forms because it is life-and-death issue”. (Yep, I know, so is the vaccine!)
  • 25 Q&A about Vaccines and Religious Exemptions.
  • Resources That You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer. Read about that.

  • National Legislative Right to Refuse Campaign
  • Millions Against Medical Mandates (MAMM), is a coalition of health freedom organizations and individuals. Their website has a good deal of information about the vaccines as well as an employee rights form and a student rights form.
  • “A group of 117 un-vaccinated staffers from Houston Methodist Hospital filed a lawsuit Friday seeking to avoid the hospital’s coronavirus vaccine mandate, saying it’s unlawful for bosses to require the shots” from this Washington Post article. The court did not see it their way.
  • Be aware that many hospitals apparently now have language in their routine treatment consent forms allowing them to vaccinate you (e.g. for flu or pneumonia) without telling you.

Data Collection and Vaccine Passports.  There is concern about proof of vaccination, so called “vaccine passports” on grounds of privacy and potential discrimination against the unvaccinated.

Supplements to take if you get the shots or want to decline.

Special cases.         

  • Strictly excluded from the pre-authorization trials were pregnant women, women of childbearing potential, recovered covid patients and those who had received covid antibodies. Those groups would not be prescribed any other drug that had been tested in that way because we just do not know if it is safe and effective for them. And no other vaccine is used with pregnant women that has an active biological agent in it. Yet, covid vaccines are already being given to pregnant women.
  • Influenza Vaccination Linked to Higher COVID Death Rates.
  • Folks over age 65 typically respond poorly to vaccines. That is for the same reason that they suffer more severe cases of the coronavirus or the flu—i.e. their immune systems are not strong enough. We talk about that situation on the radio show, especially with Bill Sardi. He advises us to make sure that we have adequate levels of the minerals zinc and selenium plus the vitamins D and C. In fact, virtually all the diet and lifestyle subjects we cover on Healthy by Nature help to strengthen immune response one way or another. But, do not expect to hear about these inexpensive alternatives from the TV networks which are funded by roughly 4 billion dollars a year in drug company advertising.
  • Recovered patients? There seems to be a worrisome controversy about the safety and effectiveness of vaccinating persons who have already had covid-19. Read more.
  • An Article in The Defender stated that “Research shows people with underlying health disorders or on immunosuppressive medications mount few antibodies to COVID vaccines, leading some to question if they should get the vaccine and, if so, what are the potential risks?” Also those on medication for inflammatory disorders and those with blood cancers showed a significantly weaker antibody response to the vaccine.”
  • Interestingly, a study shows that many of us may have some immunity already from having had head colds caused by a related corona-virus. That is discussed in this linked article.
  • Studies to get approval for vaccinating children is on the fast track. The risks of the vaccine itself to children must be weighed against the extremely low of harm from the virus. Of the very small percentage who contract covid-19, 99.997% survive. Read more about that.

Public Resistance. Polls show that roughly 1/3 of people worldwide have said that they will not take the shot. That choice may be moot in the future if the authorities are permitted to use “self-disseminating vaccines”. These are vaccines given to a few people who then will spread via supposedly safe contagious viruses to the rest of the unsuspecting population. Those automatic vaccines, once spread, will be similar in action to those currently being given and therefore will bear the same risks. It will also mark the end of “informed consent” and the choice to opt out for those with health reasons for avoiding vaccination. Various US government agencies are funding this research which is currently used in animals. Read more about the risks of self-spreading vaccines and about how current vaccines may possibly have some of that same effect.Bless you. Good luck making your decision.


Healthy By Nature Show
Saturdays 8-9am Central/Standard Time See all time zones
Toll free : 1.877.262.7843
LIVE show ONLY: 1.800.281.8255